PAUL T. SHIPALE (with inputs by Folito Nghitongovali Diawara Gaspar)
INTRODUCTION
Chinua Achebe’s poignant observation from 1983, “The trouble with Nigeria is simply and squarely a failure of leadership,” resonates with disquieting accuracy within the contemporary Namibian landscape. This enduring warning compels a critical introspection: for how long shall we, as a nation, tacitly endorse the insidious erosion of ethical standards and the systemic decay of institutions, as if such maladies were an ineluctable destiny? How long will the proverb “the goat eats where it’s tied” serve as a convenient justification for pervasive malfeasance, rather than a stark indictment of those who permit it?
In a country rich in natural resources and ostensibly governed by the democratic principles of a constitutional republic, the root of the problem is not scarcity; it’s moral stagnation. The cyclical repetition of excuses, the absence of public accountability, and the hollowing out of collective political will reflect a vicious pattern: the goat keeps eating where it’s tied, not out of hunger, but because the shepherd permits it. Namibia’s dilemma is not an exception. It’s a symptom. It reflects a systemic disease spreading across the African continent, a struggle not merely against formal colonialism but against its modern ghosts: corruption, institutional capture, and the complicit silence of political elites. So, how much longer will we accept the tether as a justification? Perhaps it’s time we cut the rope.
I – CORRUPTION AND DEMOCRACY IN NAMIBIA: IMPACTS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND PATHS FOR TRANSFORMATION
Corruption, in its most insidious form, constitutes one of the gravest threats to democratic progress and sustainable development across the African continent. In Namibia, despite the existence of republican institutions and a robust constitutional framework since the dawn of independence in 1990, this pervasive malady has progressively corroded public trust, debilitated the provision of essential services, and exacerbated social inequality. From a democratic vantage point, corruption fundamentally distorts the sacrosanct principle of popular sovereignty, systematically undermines transparency, weakens the vital separation of powers, and sabotages the very notion of meritocracy within the public service. It is, in essence, an existential threat to the democratic ideal.
Pervasive corruption, particularly at the highest levels of government as exemplified by the Fishrot scandal, has led to a profound erosion of civic trust in Namibia. Such misconduct undermines public confidence in democratic institutions and fosters widespread apathy, cynicism, and disengagement when citizens perceive political elites as operating with impunity.
This environment enables state capture by private and foreign interests, resulting in policies that deviate from the public’s needs and weaken the social contract. Misappropriation of public resources exacerbates inequality and diverts funding from essential sectors such as healthcare, education, agriculture, and infrastructure. Economically, corruption creates a volatile and hostile climate for investment, discouraging both domestic and foreign stakeholders. The result is an economy dominated by opaque political monopolies and corrupt practices, ultimately stalling inclusive growth and obstructing long-term development.
II – THE GUARDIAN THAT FALTERS: THE ANTI – CORRUPTION COMMISSION (ACC)
The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) of Namibia was established as a statutory safeguard against corruption, tasked with preventing, investigating, and assisting in prosecution to uphold the rule of law and protect public resources. Despite its noble mandate, empirical data reveals significant operational inefficiencies and a troubling reluctance to challenge politically and economically entrenched interests.
Between 2018 and 2024, of 872 cases registered, only 368 were investigated, while 483 were dismissed for “insufficient evidence” and just 25 were referred elsewhere, indicating jurisdictional ambiguity or institutional deflection. Since 2006, over 6,600 cases were filed, yet only 347 reached the courts, with fewer than 11 convictions secured over the last two years.
These figures suggest a pattern of elite protection and political inertia, undermining the ACC’s credibility as a genuine instrument of justice. Instead of dismantling entrenched corruption, the ACC risks operating as a symbolic entity that perpetuates the status quo. This perception is reinforced by recent legal proceedings in which weak criminal charges were pursued, potentially overlooking more effective civil or economic litigation, thereby allowing major actors to evade meaningful accountability.
III – VIRAL VERDICTS: A NATION EXPOSED
In a digital age where information flows instantly, Namibians have witnessed the reality of entrenched corruption without relying on traditional investigations or judicial proceedings. Social media has emerged as a powerful civic arena, exposing institutional failures through viral recordings of bribery and manipulated procurement processes. These revelations are not anomalies but symptoms of a systemic culture that normalises and even anticipates the abuse of public authority. The rapid circulation of visual evidence has triggered widespread public consciousness, revealing a governance structure compromised from within. The digital sphere has become a mirror both reflective and indicting, calling attention to the urgent need for structural reform and institutional accountability.
IV – ACC IN ACTION: GLIMMERS AMIDST THE GLOOM?
Despite its manifest struggles and the pervasive scepticism regarding its efficacy, the ACC has, on occasion, embarked upon the pursuit of significant cases, offering fleeting glimmers of its potential, even if often overshadowed by the broader systemic failures:
The Fishrot Scandal (2019 – Present): This monumental scandal, a veritable leviathan of corruption, involved the alleged syphoning of over $15 million in bribes for the illicit allocation of fishing quotas. The arrests of former ministers Bernhard Esau and Sacky Shanghala, once titans of the political landscape, sent shockwaves through the nation. Yet, the wheels of justice grind with agonising slowness; trials remain protracted, and justice, for the aggrieved Namibian public, remains elusive. This case, in its sheer scale and the alleged involvement of high-ranking officials, stands as a stark testament to the audacity of elite capture within the Namibian state.
The NAMCOR N$560 Million Oil Fraud (2025): The recent unearthing of the NAMCOR scandal, involving the National Petroleum Corporation of Namibia, represents a particularly egregious example of the brazen misappropriation of public funds. The arrests, including that of former Managing Director Immanuel Mulunga, on charges of fraud and racketeering in connection with bogus fuel deals, reveal a massive and sophisticated laundering operation designed to divert national resources for private enrichment. This case, still unfolding, underscores the vulnerability of strategic state-owned enterprises to predatory practices and highlights the urgent need for enhanced oversight and accountability mechanisms within these critical national assets.
The MEATCO Irregularities (2025): While perhaps not yet reaching the seismic proportions of Fishrot or NAMCOR, the emerging irregularities within MEATCO, Namibia’s national meat processor, are equally concerning. Reports of the suspension of the acting CEO amidst probes into alleged theft and irregular dealings within the state-owned enterprise signal a disturbing breach of public trust in a sector vital to the nation’s economy and food security. This case, alongside NAMCOR, serves as a potent reminder that the cancer of corruption is not confined to a single ministry or sector but metastasises across the entire spectrum of state-owned entities, undermining their very purpose and draining the national coffers.
Roads Authority Weighbridge Case (2025): This case exposes a cynical scheme wherein state assets were allegedly diverted to a private company and subsequently leased back to the state, a clear instance of self-serving manipulation of public resources. Assets have been seized and arrests made, and further prosecutions are anticipated, offering a faint hope that such brazen acts of economic sabotage will not go unpunished.
BIPA Document Forgery: Advanced investigations into forged company records and administrative corruption within the Business and Intellectual Property Authority (BIPA) are currently awaiting the Prosecutor General’s decision. This case, though seemingly administrative, points to the insidious nature of corruption that can undermine the very integrity of official records and legal frameworks.
Erongo Region Procurement Scandals: The Erongo Region has become a hotbed of corruption, with over 16 court cases involving municipal fuel abuse, illicit bribes, and shady tenders collectively valued at over $2 million in Walvis Bay alone. These localised but pervasive instances of graft demonstrate how corruption, even at the municipal level, can significantly impede local development and erode public services.
Ministerial & Municipal Cases: Investigations spanning key ministries and various municipal structures frequently encounter bureaucratic inertia. Too often, these cases are either referred elsewhere or, more disturbingly, shelved due to “insufficient evidence“, a recurring refrain that fuels public cynicism and reinforces the perception of a system designed to protect the powerful rather than prosecute them. Is taking or what I literally call “stealing files” from an office not an offence worthy of a disciplinary hearing or tampering with evidence and warranting arrest or criminal charges? Is colluding with a secretary or a wife by an ED or former DED not a case of corruption?
V – THE CALL: WHO MUST LEAD?
Namibia’s path to institutional renewal cannot be credibly entrusted to those entrenched in and benefiting from the corrupt status quo. Genuine reform requires a new generation of leaders guided by integrity, intellectual courage, and a transformative vision of governance who are prepared to fundamentally reimagine the state’s structures. This leadership must embrace a Pan – Africanist ethos, recognising that Namibia’s pursuit of social justice and economic independence is inseparable from the broader continental struggle for self – determination. Achieving true sovereignty demands a decisive shift away from neocolonial economic models that perpetuate dependency.
Recent scandals involving Fishrot, Namcor, Erongo, and Meatco signal a systemic crisis in governance. These incidents must galvanise sustained reform, civic activism, and electoral accountability. Frantz Fanon’s call to generational purpose resonates urgently: Namibia’s youth must rise not as passive witnesses but as agents of transformational change restoring dignity and sovereignty systematically eroded by corruption.
VI – HOW THE NAMIBIAN PRESIDENCY CAN USE THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION FOR THE NATION
The presidency is crucial for restoring democratic legitimacy and consolidating a transformative state by elevating the fight against corruption from a slogan to an actionable government agenda. This agenda should be built on five pillars:
Strengthen the Independence of Inspection Institutions Empowering bodies like the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) with autonomy, resources, and freedom to investigate all figures, including those in the executive. Appointments must be merit-based, and parliament must ensure continuous scrutiny; Promote Active Transparency: Instituting mandatory publication of public contracts, asset statements for senior leaders, and open digital platforms for real-time budget monitoring. Transparency should be proactive and pervasive; Encourage Citizen Participation and Whistleblower Protection: Recognising the fight against corruption as a collective endeavour involving civil society, labour unions, independent media, and community organisations. Robust legal frameworks for whistleblower protection are essential to safeguard those who expose malfeasance; Strict Punishment and Public Examples: Ensuring zero impunity by expeditiously bringing emblematic cases to trial, resulting in swift decisions and exemplary penalties. Accountability should apply equally to all, regardless of their position.
Ethical and Civic Education: Spearheading a national campaign for education in citizenship, integrity, and public ethics, integrating these themes into school curricula and public servant development. This invests in the nation’s moral fabric.
How to Combat Corruption in Practice: Suggested Paths
Beyond the overarching pillars of presidential leadership, concrete and actionable pathways must be pursued to dismantle the architecture of corruption: Reform of the Public Purchasing System Implement electronic bidding with real-time auditing to reduce manipulation and enhance transparency; Special Anti – Corruption Courts: Establish specialised judicial sections with judges trained in white-collar crimes to expedite trials; Regional and International Cooperation: Actively participate in judicial cooperation mechanisms with regional (AU, SADC) and international (UN) bodies to trace and recover illicit capital flows; Limitation of Mandates and Revision of Immunities: Review constitutional clauses that create “zones of comfort” for corrupt leaders, including term limits and re-evaluation of immunities; Digitalisation of Government Processes: Reduce human interaction in licensing and public concessions through comprehensive digitalisation to curtail bribery and undue influence.
VII – THE BROKEN SYSTEM: BEYOND “BAD APPLES“
Namibia’s corruption crisis is systemic in nature, deeply embedded within the architecture of governance, and extends far beyond isolated cases or individual misconduct. The phenomenon is reflected in several interrelated areas of institutional failure: Procurement Dysfunction: Public procurement processes are frequently circumvented or manipulated to benefit politically connected individuals, as exemplified by the NAMCOR and MEATCO cases; Elite Impunity: The justice system displays a troubling imbalance where influential figures receive minimal repercussions, while ordinary citizens face swift penalties. The delays in prosecuting the Fishrot scandal underscore this erosion of legal equality and deepen public distrust; Whistleblower Insecurity: The absence of comprehensive legal protections leaves whistleblowers exposed to retaliation and financial ruin, fostering a culture of silence and shielding corruption from scrutiny; Institutional Weakness and Attrition: The departure of over 20 ACC investigators in early 2025 has critically weakened Namibia’s anti-corruption apparatus. This loss of expertise, coupled with budgetary limitations, has paralysed key functions such as anti-money laundering efforts and drawn concern from international bodies like the FATF. State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) Corruption: Strategic SOEs have devolved into instruments of private gain due to patronage, mismanagement, and political interference. Despite having sound legislation on paper, the sector suffers from a profound leadership deficit and lack of accountability.
These elements collectively signify a governance crisis requiring not superficial adjustments but a fundamental reevaluation of Namibia’s leadership ethos and institutional integrity.
The Awakening: The People Are Watching
Despite entrenched corruption, the Namibian populace is no longer passive. A collective awakening is occurring, marked by digital activism, fervent debates, and a growing public outrage. Afrobarometer data shows 68% of Namibians believe most politicians are corrupt, reflecting deep disillusionment. Students, journalists, and civil society are at the forefront of this movement.
CONCLUSION: RECLAIMING THE REPUBLIC’S PROMISE
Namibia, a nation forged in the crucible of a protracted struggle for dignity, justice, and freedom, carries within its very DNA the noble dream of a truly liberated and prosperous society. That dream has, regrettably, been deferred, its lustre tarnished by the insidious corrosion of corruption. But it is not yet lost. This singular moment, charged with a burgeoning public outrage, defined by the immense potential of new resource discoveries, and marked by an unprecedented digital awakening, demands that we confront corruption not merely as a legal or administrative problem but as a profound national moral reckoning. It is a challenge that calls for a collective introspection, a re – evaluation of our values, and an unwavering commitment to the principles of integrity and justice. The question that now confronts us is no longer if Namibia can change, for the will of the people is stirring. The burning, existential question that hangs heavy in the Namibian air is: Who will have the courage, the intellectual fortitude, and the moral conviction to lead that change? The future of the Republic, its promise and its potential, awaits their decisive emergence. Corruption is not merely a legal problem; it is a central moral and political issue in the very construction of Namibia’s future. The presidency can and indeed must lead a democratic renaissance by strategically positioning the fight against corruption as a powerful engine for social justice, governmental efficiency, and popular empowerment. Instead of merely reacting to the inevitable eruption of scandals, the Head of State must adopt an active, audacious, and pedagogical stance, unequivocally demonstrating that power can be exercised with integrity, transparency, and an unwavering commitment to future generations.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of our employers and this newspaper but solely our personal views as citizens and Pan-Africanists.
