05
Dec
The recent revelation that the Swapo Party politburo has taken the bold step of directly deciding who should serve as mayors and members of management committees in towns under its control has sparked inevitable debate across the political landscape. Critics are already denouncing the move as heavy-handed centralisation, a retreat from democratic norms, and an overreach that sidelines elected councillors. Yet others, including this newspaper, see a more complex picture, one that reflects a maturing understanding within Swapo of its vulnerabilities, shortcomings, and the need to adapt to a political environment far less forgiving than the one it dominated for…
